← AMS EnglishContract file · Updated 29 Jul 2026
K-pop power anatomy

They left the company.
Why are they still in the group?

BLACKPINK split group management from solo careers. BTS kept both under one label. TWICE may face the same choice next. The real question is not “Did they disband?” It is: who now controls the name, schedule and money?

AMS is not anti-agency. An agency that finds talent, risks capital and builds global distribution deserves to profit. The investigation begins when that power stops producing value—and starts blocking whoever could replace it.

00 / THE STANDARD
Not anti-company. Anti-closed gate.

Before criticizing power, test what it contributes

Big agencies are not villains for being big. They financed uncertain debuts, trained artists and built distribution small companies could not. Size becomes a problem only when yesterday’s contribution is used to suppress tomorrow’s competitor.

01

Did the incumbent build something difficult?

Capital, training, distribution, global promotion and years of risk count as real contributions.

PASSPower has a reason to exist.FAILThe position is only inherited or protected.
02

Can the artist leave without losing their identity?

A fair system may protect investment, but it cannot turn a person’s entire career into company property.

PASSThe door is costly, but open.FAILThe contract becomes a cage.
03

Can a better team compete?

New agencies and personal companies need a path to prove themselves without private gatekeepers moving the rules.

PASSThe incumbent competes on performance.FAILPower replaces evidence.
04

Who pays when the system fails?

The party taking the largest reward should not push every loss onto trainees, artists or fans.

PASSReward and responsibility stay together.FAILProfit is private; failure is outsourced.
THE RULE

If the old agency is still the best choice, artists will stay because it creates value. If they can only be kept by controlling the name, schedule and exit, that is not loyalty. It is a blocked market.

01 / THE MAP
Same industry, different control systems

Three models fans should stop mixing together

These are management structures, not rankings of loyalty. BTS staying with BigHit can be a rational vote of confidence. BLACKPINK leaving YG for solo work can be a rational demand for control. Neither decision is moral proof by itself; the outcomes have to earn the verdict.

INTEGRATED MODEL

BTS

One label manages the group and all seven individual careers.
BTS group → BigHit MusicRM / Jin / SUGA / j-hope / Jimin / V / Jung Kook → BigHit MusicOne planning center; seven solo brands
CONFIRMED · ALL 7 RENEWED
SPLIT MODEL

BLACKPINK

YG retains the group relationship. The members control solo careers elsewhere.
BLACKPINK group → YGJennie / Lisa / Jisoo / Rosé → separate solo structuresCoordination replaces total control
CONFIRMED · GROUP / SOLO DIVIDED
DECISION POINT

TWICE

All nine renewed in 2022. JYP confirmed in July 2026 that a second renewal round is now under discussion.
TWICE group → JYP during current talksGrowing solo, acting and unit careersNo final group/solo architecture announced
CONFIRMED TALKS · OUTCOME NOT PUBLIC
02 / THE RIGHTS
“Staying in the group” is only the beginning

What actually gets separated?

Group layer

The asset fans share

Group name & trademarkWho may use it?
Albums & touringWho pays and produces?
Fan club & platformsWho owns the relationship?
Archives & old catalogWho can monetize history?
Individual layer

The career each member owns

Solo musicLabel, masters, publishing
Acting & varietyAuditions and scheduling
Brand endorsementsFees and conflicts
Personal companyStaff, tax, creative control
Why an idol wants the split
  • Keep more of the value created by personal fame.
  • Choose projects the original idol agency is weak at—especially acting or global work.
  • Build a career that can survive long gaps between group comebacks.
  • Control pace, staff and public identity after years of collective scheduling.
Why the original agency accepts it
  • Retain the group brand instead of losing everything.
  • Monetize rare, high-demand reunions without funding every solo career.
  • Avoid a hostile breakup that damages catalog and fandom value.
  • Turn permanent exclusivity into negotiated coordination.
What deserves credit: the original agency may have absorbed years of failed trainees and expensive launches before a star became profitable. What does not follow: that early risk does not automatically justify permanent control over every future solo career.
03 / EVIDENCE
Read the label before the claim

What we know—and what fandom is predicting

AMS separates disclosed facts from recurring industry patterns and future scenarios. The last category is analysis, not insider information.

CONFIRMED

A group contract and a solo contract can be separated.

YG announced that BLACKPINK renewed for group activities but would not sign additional YG contracts for individual activities. Leaving the agency for solo work did not mean leaving BLACKPINK.

CONFIRMED

BTS chose the opposite architecture.

HYBE announced renewals with all seven BTS members under BigHit Music. Publicly available information does not support the claim that their personal careers moved to separate outside agencies.

INDUSTRY PATTERN

Different agencies make a comeback possible—but harder.

Girls’ Generation and MAMAMOO show that a group can survive distributed management. The trade-off is slower scheduling, more negotiations and fewer moments when every member’s incentives align.

POSSIBLE SCENARIO

TWICE could eventually adopt a split model.

Nine mature careers create nine different needs: music, acting, Japanese promotions, brand work, rest and creative control. That makes a split structure plausible. It does not make it confirmed.

NOT PUBLIC

Fans do not know the decisive numbers.

Renewal bonuses, commission rates, minimum group schedules, veto rights, trademark licenses and solo revenue splits are usually confidential. Confident social-media claims about those terms are still guesses.

04 / NEXT MOVE
The question ONCE actually cares about

Why TWICE is a genuine test case

All nine members renewed with JYP in 2022. But a second renewal is not merely “stay or leave.” A mature group can preserve TWICE while changing who manages each woman outside TWICE.

2015

One group, one machine

JYP launches nine members through a centralized idol system.

2022

All nine renew

JYP publicly confirms renewal before the original contracts expire.

JUL 2026

Second talks confirmed

JYP says renewal discussions are in progress and promises an announcement after decisions are final.

NEXT

Architecture, not loyalty

The unknown is whether group and individual management remain bundled.

CONFIRMED STATUS · 14 JUL 2026

JYP publicly said TWICE was in a contract-renewal discussion period. Reports claiming that a specific member had already left were not confirmed by the company. The live question is now the contract architecture—not a hypothetical future negotiation and not a proven departure.

Read the dated report and JYP response ↗
THE QUESTIONS FANS KEEP ASKING

Open a question for the useful answer. “Not public” means the contract term has not been disclosed—not that a rumor fills the gap.

01Does JYP guarantee a minimum number of TWICE comebacks?
NOT PUBLIC

No public announcement discloses a minimum comeback count. A renewal can contain activity commitments, but fans cannot infer one from the fact that all members renewed. The useful evidence is the actual release and tour schedule—or a term disclosed by JYP or the members.

02Can a member move acting or solo music elsewhere but keep the group contract?
POSSIBLE · IF NEGOTIATED

Yes as a contract structure; BLACKPINK is the clearest major example. It is not an automatic right. The group agency, the member and any outside manager must agree on trademark use, scheduling, revenue and conflicts. No public source confirms that TWICE has chosen this structure.

03Who gets priority when a solo schedule conflicts with a group tour?
CONTRACT DEPENDENT

The contracts and coordination agreements decide. A workable split model normally reserves group windows, notice periods and conflict rules. Without those terms, the side that controls the calendar gains practical power even if neither side formally owns the other career.

04Would nine outside teams make a comeback too expensive to coordinate?
REAL COST · NOT A VETO

It raises transaction costs: nine calendars, staff teams, insurers, brand conflicts and approval chains. That can make comebacks slower and rarer, but it does not make them impossible. A single group-management entity can still centralize the album and tour while solo teams coordinate around fixed windows.

05Does the TWICE trademark stay usable if some members leave JYP?
RIGHTS MUST BE AGREED

Leaving an agency does not by itself transfer or cancel a group trademark. Continued use depends on ownership, the renewed group agreement and any license or consent. Fans should look for a company notice or trademark record—not assume that personal departure either ends TWICE or gives unrestricted use of the name.

06Is a rarer comeback a decline—or the price of long-term survival?
OUTCOME, NOT SLOGAN

It can be either. Fewer releases may reflect weak coordination and fading investment, or a deliberate trade: less frequency in exchange for member autonomy and a longer group life. Judge the model by agreed activity, production quality, member participation and whether promised schedules actually happen.

05 / SURVIVAL
“Still together” has levels

A group can survive legally and still disappear operationally

What split management protects

The right to reunite

It prevents “leaving the company” from automatically becoming “leaving the group.” Members can grow outside the original system without formally destroying the shared identity.

What it cannot guarantee

The ability to reunite often

Eight calendars, four agencies, an acting shoot, a solo tour and a brand conflict can defeat a comeback without anyone disbanding. Legal survival is not the same as operational momentum.

FUNCTIONING INCUMBENTUses scale to make artists stronger than they could be alone.
EXTRACTIVE INCUMBENTUses ownership to keep stronger alternatives from being tested.
06 / RECEIPTS
Open sources used for this analysis

Check the claims, not the fandom confidence

KEEP DIGGING
The contract is connected to the whole machine

Continue through AMS

AMS · Confirmed facts, visible assumptions, no imaginary contract leaks.