AMS ANSWERSBrowse all Customer Service (General) answers
◇Customer Service (General) answer

Why do some customers repeatedly request refunds?

SHORT ANSWER

There are three different situations behind repeat refunds, and the count alone cannot tell them apart. Some products really fail often (perishables, fragile goods, unreliable carriers). Some requests are genuine disputes about whether a problem is the seller's fault. And some are abuse — fabricated photos, returning a different item, returning used goods as new. Only evidence identifies the last group.

01

What to do now

  1. Customers: photograph the item, label and packaging as soon as you open it.
  2. Agents: record the reason and evidence per order and leave the abuse decision to the review team.
  3. Businesses: compare a customer's claim rate with the defect rate of the same product and carrier before drawing conclusions.
What changes the outcome

Legitimate: the item was defective or not as described. Disputed: cause unclear. Abuse: evidence was falsified.

02

Who owns the resolution

The retailer decides refunds under its policy; fraud is for police and courts.

03

Evidence to prepare

  • Your account email or user ID
  • Screenshots or a confirmation number for the specific order/booking/transaction
  • Any messages you already exchanged with support about this
AI CASE BUILDER

Turn this answer into a question about your case

Give another AI the facts it needs—not just “what should I do?”

Copy & paste
READY-TO-PASTE PROMPT
I need practical help with a Customer Service (General) issue.

The policy question: Why do some customers repeatedly request refunds?
Useful context I found: There are three different situations behind repeat refunds, and the count alone cannot tell them apart. Some products really fail often (perishables, fragile goods, unreliable carriers). Some requests are genuine disputes about whether a problem is the seller's fault. And some are abuse — fabricated photos, returning a different item, returning used goods as new. Only evidence identifies the last group.

My specific situation: [Describe what happened, including dates and messages shown]
The outcome I want: [Refund, verification, appeal, account recovery, explanation, etc.]
Important constraints: [Country, deadline, booking/account status, documents already submitted, budget, or other limits]

Please:
1. Identify any missing facts you need before reaching a conclusion.
2. Separate platform policy, local law, and your own inference.
3. Give me the safest next steps in priority order.
4. Use current official sources where possible and flag anything that may have changed.
5. Draft a concise message I can paste to customer support.
6. Do not invent account access, guarantees, refund rights, or legal conclusions.
Nothing entered here is sent to AMS. The prompt is assembled in your browser.
05

Why this policy exists

In NRF and Appriss Retail's 2023 survey of US retailers, the return-fraud types retailers said they experienced were: returns of used, non-defective merchandise (wardrobing) 49%, returns of shoplifted or stolen merchandise 44%, returns of merchandise bought with fraudulent or stolen tender 37%, and return fraud by organized retail crime groups 20%.

These are retailer survey responses, not proof about any individual customer.

Last verified against the sources above on 2026-10-22. Policy and deadlines can change -- use the official support link below for the current rule.

06 · OFFICIAL SUPPORT

Need to act on your account?

AMS explains the rule but cannot access your account, issue a refund or change a platform decision.

Find the official support route
07

Related next step

Refund

Why can't customer service agents issue refunds?

Most companies separate handling a request from approving money. Front-line agents can log and explain; refunds outside the standard policy are approved by someone with a higher limit. That limit is internal and not published. Some refunds are not discretionary: when a seller cannot ship an internet or phone order within the promised time (or 30 days if none was stated), the FTC Mail, Internet, or Telephone Order Merchandise Rule requires the seller to offer you the option of a prompt refund.

Read answer →Refund

Why do companies offer compensation only after repeated complaints?

Often because the company compares the cost of another contact, an escalation, a chargeback or a lost customer with the cost of a credit, and pays when the credit is cheaper (AMS interpretation). That means persistence can be rewarded while people with the same problem who complained once get nothing. Repeated complaints are not proof of abuse; often the first contact simply did not fix the problem.

Read answer →Refund

Can customers get refunds after 30 days?

It depends on why. There is no general federal law that lets you return a non-defective item for a change of mind; the store's own return policy sets that window. The FTC Cooling-Off Rule gives three business days to cancel certain sales made at your home or at a temporary location (generally $25 or more at home, $130 or more elsewhere), not ordinary store or online purchases. If the item is defective, the implied warranty of merchantability under UCC § 2-314 can apply well after 30 days, unless it was validly disclaimed.

Read answer →Refund

How do retailers detect refund abuse?

Fair detection looks at evidence, not at how often someone asks. Signals that point to abuse include the same photo reused across orders, a returned item whose serial number or components do not match what was shipped, and use or damage that contradicts the stated reason. Signals that do not, on their own: many refunds, a rude tone, or a request after 30 days. AMS did not verify which detection tools specific retailers use.

Read answer →
KEEP RESEARCHING IN ENGLISH

Need the structure behind the individual rule?

AMS English connects platform rules to Korean business, labor, entertainment and institutional systems without dropping you into an untranslated page.

Open the English Research Desk →