Who is responsible when an outsourced agent makes a mistake?
Generally the company you dealt with. Under the respondeat superior doctrine, an employer or principal is held responsible for wrongful acts of its employees or agents within the scope of the employment or agency; an outsourced agent is acting for the brand. There is no single national standard, and the outcome depends on the facts and state law. Whether the brand later recovers costs from the outsourcer depends on their contract.
What to do now
- Ask the company to honor what the agent said, citing date, time and content.
- If you relied on wrong information and lost money, keep receipts that show the loss.
- If a company will not give you a final answer and you think its practice is deceptive, you can report it at reportfraud.ftc.gov or to your state attorney general. Card charges can be disputed with your card issuer within the Fair Credit Billing Act time limits.
Written promises are easier to enforce than verbal ones.
Who owns the resolution
The company first; a court if it refuses.
Evidence to prepare
- Your account email or user ID
- Screenshots or a confirmation number for the specific order/booking/transaction
- Any messages you already exchanged with support about this
Turn this answer into a question about your case
Give another AI the facts it needs—not just “what should I do?”
I need practical help with a Customer Service (General) issue. The policy question: Who is responsible when an outsourced agent makes a mistake? Useful context I found: Generally the company you dealt with. Under the respondeat superior doctrine, an employer or principal is held responsible for wrongful acts of its employees or agents within the scope of the employment or agency; an outsourced agent is acting for the brand. There is no single national standard, and the outcome depends on the facts and state law. Whether the brand later recovers costs from the outsourcer depends on their contract. My specific situation: [Describe what happened, including dates and messages shown] The outcome I want: [Refund, verification, appeal, account recovery, explanation, etc.] Important constraints: [Country, deadline, booking/account status, documents already submitted, budget, or other limits] Please: 1. Identify any missing facts you need before reaching a conclusion. 2. Separate platform policy, local law, and your own inference. 3. Give me the safest next steps in priority order. 4. Use current official sources where possible and flag anything that may have changed. 5. Draft a concise message I can paste to customer support. 6. Do not invent account access, guarantees, refund rights, or legal conclusions.
Why this policy exists
A record of what you were told matters most: chat transcripts, emails, the date and time of calls. Call recordings: federal law (18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d)) allows a party to a conversation to record it, or anyone to record with one party's consent, unless the recording is for a criminal or tortious purpose.
State laws can be stricter than the federal rule; AMS did not verify state statutes, so check your state before recording.
- Respondeat superior (Wex legal encyclopedia) — Legal Information Institute
- 18 U.S. Code § 2511(2)(d) — one-party consent to interception — Legal Information Institute (U.S. Code)
Last verified against the sources above on 2026-10-22. Policy and deadlines can change -- use the official support link below for the current rule.
Need to act on your account?
AMS explains the rule but cannot access your account, issue a refund or change a platform decision.